I take that to mean you are not an attorney.
So you are talking about the way things ought to be rather than the way they are.
True, they ought to be able to sell tickets to just the people they want to sell them to, but the reality is that they are bound by all kinds of regulations and laws due to the fact that they are selling Public access to a government owned and operated facility.
That is the reality. It sucks, but that’s the situation we live under.
“True, they ought to be able to sell tickets to just the people they want to sell them to, but the reality is that they are bound by all kinds of regulations and laws due to the fact that they are selling Public access to a government owned and operated facility.”
In today’s litigious society, I’m sure we’ll see a lawsuit if there’s the slightest validity to what you’re saying. In fact, we may well see one even if there’s no validity to your position...
Regardless, I’m betting that suit is a losing proposition for the plaintiff.
Wrong. I am an attorney. Are you?
You are speaking of how you think thinks might be, rather than the way they are. You talk of “all kinds of regulations and laws” that apply (and you previously referred to provisions in the lease), yet you have not cited a single law or regulation, or contractual provision, that prohibits them from doing what they are doing.