Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
Since the State could not so flagrantly discriminate against the Citizens of California, the leaseholder to State property cannot do so either.

That is utter nonsense. Absent some provision in their lease agreement requiring the Seahawks to sell to all comers, there is no requirement to do so. Private companies do not become quasi-governmental entities simply because they lease public property.

I'm shocked that Freepers would support forcing a private company to sell their product to customers the company does not want to serve. Particularly where the compnay could make a strong argument that doing so would harm the company (stadium loudness/etc. has become a significant part of the Seahawks brand).

46 posted on 01/14/2014 7:23:35 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative

How long have you been an attorney?


47 posted on 01/14/2014 8:37:04 AM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson