Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thus Spake the Potheads: The main arguments used to legitimize pot are pap.
American Thinker ^ | 01/13/2013 | Selwyn Duke

Posted on 01/13/2014 5:41:21 PM PST by SeekAndFind

It's starting to appear as if marijuana users have become the homosexual lobby of the chemically dependent. What do I mean? Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson could mention one sexual behavior (adultery) as disqualifying someone from the "kingdom of God," but mentioning that "other" sexual behavior? That's a boycottin', pardner! Likewise, there's no shortage of articles about the perils of smoking tobacco -- about how it causes lung cancer, emphysema and premature aging; about how it's a dirty, nasty habit -- all without indignant smokers crawling out of the woodwork to protest, between hacking coughs, that their passion is being unfairly demonized. But dare imply that inhaling copious amounts of marijuana smoke may not be one of Dr. Oz's top ten health recommendations, and, well, the potheads cometh.

[SNIP]

While most agree that casual drinking -- one or two drinks -- is fine and may even offer health benefits, it's universally acknowledged that drunkenness is destructive, ugly and reckless. In accordance with the old PSA, "If you have to drink to be social, it's not social drinking," it's accepted that if you have to get inebriated to deal with life, you have a problem.

[SNIP]

So I'll say that if you want to have one or two small puffs of a marijuana cigarette, fine. But you've crossed the line if you get high.

Deal?

This puts the lie to the alcohol/pot comparison. There are millions of casual drinkers who may have a beer or glass of wine with dinner but have no intention of getting tipsy. Except, however, for the few who use pot for legitimate medical purposes (and I'm dubious about the necessity of this, mind you), the goal of a marijuana smoker is ever and always to get high (drunk). The intention is always to alter his mental state.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: legalization; marijuana; pot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: nickcarraway
What government is doing isn't working to curtail drug use. It is causing problems for innocents.

/johnny

61 posted on 01/13/2014 6:49:48 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

The IRS is causing problems for innocents and you want to make ir bigger and fiercer.


62 posted on 01/13/2014 6:51:17 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I thought you said curtailing drug use is a bad thing.


63 posted on 01/13/2014 6:52:15 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
No. I want to restrain the federal government to it's constitutional box, and leave police powers to state governments.

/johnny

64 posted on 01/13/2014 6:52:31 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: greene66
Indeed, my parents and both my grandparents had never even HEARD of marijuana until they were well into adulthood. It was not a part of America unless you were some itinerant Mexican on the border, or some black jazz musician in NY. And even then, the stuff they had back then was reputedly a hundred times weaker than the brain-addling crap that exists now.

Exactly!! Pot smoking was way way out of the mainstream society. It was only during the rebellious 1960s that you had white kids starting to try out marijuana. Few blacks and Mexicans smoked it but you could find it in those communities.

It is a no-brainer to look at a little history and culture and  confirm that alcohol is our intoxicant. Mentioned in the Bible too. Jesus turned water into wine, not into pot.

65 posted on 01/13/2014 6:53:18 PM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I never said curtailing drug use was a bad thing.

It's just none of the federal government's constitutional business.

/johnny

66 posted on 01/13/2014 6:55:07 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Drango

now that was one funny album….


67 posted on 01/13/2014 7:01:08 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

It’s sad we’ve gotten to the point where any discussion of government action is assumed to mean the federal government. Even self-described “conservatives” seem to have fallen into the habit, forgetting we live in a republic and what that means.


68 posted on 01/13/2014 7:02:55 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

well done

freepers like big bro when it suits them

it’s reefer madness here


69 posted on 01/13/2014 7:05:03 PM PST by wardaddy (wifey instructede today to grow chapter president beard back again....i wonder why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
I try to remind people, but they get caught up in the immediate arguments, and don't address the root cause. And that root cause is federal over-reach.

/johnny

70 posted on 01/13/2014 7:05:13 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
So you are okay with the government taking money from me to pay for potheads pot, welfare, healthcare, culture, etc.

No I'm not, not at all. You seem to think that opposing one kind of injustice means being in favor of another... that's not me. Not by a long shot.

71 posted on 01/13/2014 7:10:18 PM PST by Oberon (John 12:5-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Everyone would be free not to smoke.

No can escape the wages of the war on drugs.


72 posted on 01/13/2014 7:32:42 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

I agree. People are so used to saying “the government”. Which government? We have multiple branches and multiple levels.

I announce that in 5 years all Federal criminal drug laws will sunset. That will give the States plenty of time to pass any laws they chose.


73 posted on 01/13/2014 7:39:57 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Our “traditional” intoxicant is a bigger health problem, results in huge amounts of violence, is a major factor in family problems and results in over 25000 vehicular deaths a year. Ask any ER doc which drug is a bigger problem and more dangerous. But alcohol is legal as it should be adults should be allowed to make decisions about their own body. And LIKE WITH PROHIBITION the Cure is worse then the Disease.


74 posted on 01/13/2014 7:49:06 PM PST by Kozak ("Send them back your fierce defiance! Stamp upon the cursed alliance! To arms, to arms in Dixie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Like it isn’t already.


75 posted on 01/13/2014 7:50:27 PM PST by Kozak ("Send them back your fierce defiance! Stamp upon the cursed alliance! To arms, to arms in Dixie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DManA
That will give the States plenty of time to pass any laws they chose.

Most people don't even realize that if all the federal drug laws disappeared overnight the drugs would still be illegal by their own state laws.

76 posted on 01/13/2014 7:51:11 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

And some states will legalize. Then we can all stand back and watch to see if that state degenerates into reefer madness. Or not.


77 posted on 01/13/2014 7:56:14 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I drink one glass on wine; I feel it. Two glasses at a social occasion, I’m buzzed, chatty, at ease.

There’s a huge difference between buzzed and stupid drunk, falling down drunk, ugly drunk, puking drunk, fighting drunk, crying drunk, MVA drunk, passed out drunk, dead drunk.

Moderation in all things.

I have no desire to ingest marijuana in any form. I have a very strong desire to see the state back off from its quasi-military police, no-knock raids and forfeiture laws.


78 posted on 01/13/2014 8:03:14 PM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greene66

My father smoked marijuana in front of me in 1971. HE might have been an adult before he heard of it, but not me.

What time frame are you talking about?


79 posted on 01/13/2014 8:06:36 PM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Money talks.

To the tune of 27% tax in Colorado, that's a 25% tax on Mary Jane plus 2% sales tax. (Subject to upward mobility)

..........and that's what it's all about.

80 posted on 01/13/2014 8:11:53 PM PST by Graybeard58 (_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson