Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/13/2014 2:02:07 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Yeah, until the NSA reveals some juicy texts and e-mails all taken out of context.


2 posted on 01/13/2014 2:03:17 PM PST by henkster (Communists never negotiate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Too late for Traitor Roberts to buy legacy salvation.


3 posted on 01/13/2014 2:03:36 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

My take on this issue and the supremes is, at its core, more about the court than anything else. What is the purpose of the Supreme Court in our system of government? The answer should be, to protect the Constitution. If not that, we are finished as a constitutional government. I can imagine that some, if not all of the Justices, realize that. Their authority and indeed their very future is in doubt and they must know that.


8 posted on 01/13/2014 2:17:51 PM PST by billhilly (Has Pelosi read it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Well one would hope.


10 posted on 01/13/2014 2:33:23 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Gosh, we thought they’d rule against Obamacare too.


11 posted on 01/13/2014 2:34:05 PM PST by llevrok (Obama 2008 : "If you vote for me, you can keep your country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I have no faith that this Court under Roberts will uphold the Constitution. The real issue isn’t even being addressed. The Constitution says the President can make a recess appointment when the position becomes vacant during the recess. It does not give the President the power to make a recess appointment to end run the Senate if the position does not become vacant during the recess. Both parties violate this. But as usual Obama pushes the violation to the extreme because the Constitution means nothing to him, or apparently to his party.


13 posted on 01/13/2014 2:40:13 PM PST by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t worry. Roberts will rule that the recess appointments are a tax and some folks will say it is a magnificent political strategy.


14 posted on 01/13/2014 2:41:01 PM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This one should be a slam dunk, but the justices sounded very favorable on Obamacare...we were mostly concerned about Kennedy, and he was clearly thinking our way in his questioning. We didn’t foresee our Roberts turning twisting his thoughts like a pretzel to rule for Obama.


15 posted on 01/13/2014 2:45:07 PM PST by ilgipper (Obama is proving that very bad ideas can be wrapped up in pretty words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

We thought that about ObamaCare too.

C.J. Roberts is a reliable Obama vote, so O has his safe majority on ALL issues.

Eisenhower once said the biggest mistake he made as President was appointing Earl Warren to the Supreme Court. I suspect Roberts will be W’s biggest mistake.


16 posted on 01/13/2014 2:46:17 PM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Audentis Fortuna Iuvat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Just like it sounded like they’d rule against an obviously unconstitutional Husseincare.


17 posted on 01/13/2014 2:51:44 PM PST by TexasGunLover ("Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists."-- President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

That can’t be. Don’t they know Christie closed a bridge lane? And misappropriated Sandy funds? Everything else is faux scandal.


18 posted on 01/13/2014 2:55:53 PM PST by informavoracious (Root for Obamacare and healthcare.gov failure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

How much more damage will the Supremes do to the remaining legitimacy of America’s enemies in FedGov?


19 posted on 01/13/2014 3:00:46 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind


20 posted on 01/13/2014 3:02:34 PM PST by Iron Munro (Orwell: There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

When we get control, let’s eliminate the NLRB and the Civil Rights Comission. And while we are at it let’s eliminate some judges seats.


22 posted on 01/13/2014 5:36:50 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson