Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 01/15/2014 11:23:33 AM PST by Jim Robinson, reason:

Enough already!



Skip to comments.

One Nation Under Drugs
Townhall.com ^ | January 13, 2014 | Scottie Hughes

Posted on 01/13/2014 11:39:29 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last
To: Responsibility2nd

On the contrary, “the common good” does NOT over-ride personal freedoms, so long as others are not harmed by their exercise. Abortion and pedophilia cause direct harm to people other than those who practice it. A person smoking a joint in their own house does not.

But thanks for supporting the “gun-grabbers” arguments anyway...


41 posted on 01/13/2014 1:12:36 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Amen to that.


42 posted on 01/13/2014 1:13:05 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I'm glad that at least you can see that the author's points are idiotic. She is obviously not a writer. This is more like a letter to the editor.

But it is not unreasonable to decriminalize pot. The anti marijuana crusaders are way off base. In my, and millions of Americans, humble opinion.

43 posted on 01/13/2014 1:13:18 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gdani

How you equate ideals like being against “abortion, queer marriages, pedophillia, and so on...”

with being in favor of Obama deciding we should turn in our guns is fascinating.


44 posted on 01/13/2014 1:14:22 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

Interestingly, “gun control” is also deeply rooted in racism.


45 posted on 01/13/2014 1:15:28 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

In what stoned out frame of mind do you see an argument for the “gun-grabbers” arguments here?

Its bad enough that you defend illgal drugs, but to make up and insert arguments not on the table is just too liberal.


46 posted on 01/13/2014 1:17:59 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: skinndogNN
You know, I wouldn't go to work while drunk. I don't believe many people would show up at work while high.

I have my own (small) business. I've been working as a mechanic for over 40yrs. I have two people working with me and I tell them both I don't care what you do at home, but when your at work, NO BEER, WEED or cell phones texting, etc .

One day (during the summer, 85degs) while pulling a tranny from a customers truck (at his house), the customer came outta the house with two cold beers. He went to hand it to my assistant, but I told him no. He became a little pissed off, but I told him NOT DURING WORK.

If any of my assistants ever came to work drunk, they'd be fired on the spot. I wouldn't blame the alcohol, just as I wouldn't blame the weed.

47 posted on 01/13/2014 1:18:58 PM PST by Mikey (He that refuses to know and exert his rights, doesn't deserve them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yep. A nation of degenerate dopeheads.

America has become a damned sewer of a country. Socialism, dope, and homo-marriage. My interest in its preservation gets smaller and smaller by the day. I suspect by 2016, I won’t even bother voting anymore. There is just no reason to.


48 posted on 01/13/2014 1:21:18 PM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Agreed.


49 posted on 01/13/2014 1:21:48 PM PST by Mikey (He that refuses to know and exert his rights, doesn't deserve them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
How you equate ideals like being against “abortion, queer marriages, pedophillia, and so on...”

with being in favor of Obama deciding we should turn in our guns is fascinating.

No, what's fascinating is how far you seem ready to bend over for the "common good", comrade.

50 posted on 01/13/2014 1:22:11 PM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Yes it is.


51 posted on 01/13/2014 1:24:09 PM PST by Mikey (He that refuses to know and exert his rights, doesn't deserve them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/taxact/taxact.htm


52 posted on 01/13/2014 1:26:56 PM PST by Mikey (He that refuses to know and exert his rights, doesn't deserve them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: skinndogNN
And as a businessman, can I trust Colorado companies with my business? Or is everyone going to be in the smoking area getting high?

The new Colorado law explicitly provides that private employers can conduct drug tests and can fire people for marijuana use.

53 posted on 01/13/2014 1:27:15 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/LIBRARY/studies/vlr/vlrtoc.htm


54 posted on 01/13/2014 1:28:16 PM PST by Mikey (He that refuses to know and exert his rights, doesn't deserve them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: gdani

I’ve made my point that I’m against “abortion, queer marriages, pedophillia, and so on...” for the common good.

Twice now you have laughed and sneered at these conservative values.

Tell us. What else do you hate? Tea Parties? The Constitution? Freedom of Speech?

After all. These are also all for that “common good” that you so detest.


55 posted on 01/13/2014 1:29:10 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Your personal freedoms do not overide the common good. Unless of course you think like a liberal.

So you're in favor of Mayor Bloomberg's ban on large sodas?

56 posted on 01/13/2014 1:30:11 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

There is nothing “stoned out” about my frame of mind, and I did not make up your argument - you did. I do not use illegal drugs and your implication that I do is not appreciated.

With that said, the “stoned out frame of mind” is as follows:

The most common “gun-grabber” argument is “your personal freedom does NOT trump the common good”.

You used that exact argument to justify outlawing drugs.

Responsible gun ownership by an individual causes no harm to others and therefore cannot be justified with the “common good” argument.

Responsible drug use by an individual likewise causes no harm to others and therefore also cannot be justified with the “common good” argument.

Arguing that drug use should be outlawed because some people use drugs irresponsibly is just as logical as arguing that guns should be outlawed because some people use guns irresponsibly.

Remember, I am talking about activities which do not harm other persons when practiced responsibly. As I’ve already stated, your previously referenced abortion and pedophilia comparisons do not pass that test.


57 posted on 01/13/2014 1:32:36 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Well, IIRC, used to be when you got off the plane in Malaya, there was a amnesty barrel and a warning sign: “Possession of illegal drugs or weapons is punishable by death.”
I don’t think they had much problem with drugs.

But I’m not going to endorse such measures (any more). If foks want to use drugs, there should be penalties for operating vehicles, etc., under the influence, and insurance companies should be allowed deny claims, refuse insurance, etc., based on drug usage. But in today’s “no fault” society, that isn’t doable either.


58 posted on 01/13/2014 1:34:20 PM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

See post 46.


59 posted on 01/13/2014 1:34:51 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/history/first12000/abel.htm


60 posted on 01/13/2014 1:35:11 PM PST by Mikey (He that refuses to know and exert his rights, doesn't deserve them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson