To: jimbo123
I really, really wish people would stop adding -gate as a suffix to every political event to indicate a scandal. It isn’t very clever.
3 posted on
01/13/2014 5:59:37 AM PST by
arderkrag
(An Unreconstructed Georgian, STANDING WITH RAND.)
To: arderkrag
I think Christie would rather add a donut to this scandal. How about calling it BridgeDonut, instead?
6 posted on
01/13/2014 6:01:20 AM PST by
jimbo123
To: arderkrag
I really, really wish people would stop adding -gate as a suffix to every political event to indicate a scandal. It isn’t very clever.Yeah, but it would have been cool if this had happened in San Francisco. Would it be Golden Gate-gate or just Golden Gate?
7 posted on
01/13/2014 6:02:13 AM PST by
TruthShallSetYouFree
( July 4, 1776: Declaration of Independence. Nov 6, 2012: Declaration of Dependence. R.I.P. America.)
To: arderkrag
I agree. We don’t need any more “gates”.
A scandal is a scandal is a scandal.........As Rush says, words have meaning.
11 posted on
01/13/2014 6:04:19 AM PST by
basil
(2ASisters.org)
To: arderkrag
I really, really wish people would stop adding -gate as a suffix to every political event to indicate a scandal. It isn’t very clever.I agree. The new 'suffix' should be 'ghazi'. How about 'Bridgeghazi'?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson