Posted on 01/12/2014 11:20:27 PM PST by zipper
"...scheduled to fly to Dallas with a stop in Branson, Missouri (BKG) but instead, the aircraft touched down at Taney County Airport (PLK), 8.6 miles away from its intermediate stop"
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
It’s the mark of a good pilot to be able to land anywhere.
Now if he is really good he will be able to persuade the NTSB and his supervisors that he was just practicing his emergency landing skills on a shorter runway and then watch his career really take off.
If they are good they can land a 737 in as short as 3300 feet using 40 degrees flap, spoilers, and thrust reversers.
Santos Dumont Airport (IATA: SDU; Rio, Brazil) has a runway that is only 4341 ft. long. It receives 737s on a regular basis.
A B737 is capable of landing on short runways IF properly configured and pilot technique flown for a short field landing on a 4000 ft runway.
If you think you are landing on a 10,000 ft runway with plenty of room and have the plane configured for an easy landing with long roll out that minimizes wear and tear on the airplane like Southwest pilots are taught to do and you are actually landing on a 4000 ft runway - well, lets just say things could get interesting.
And with ObamaCare, it'll become the same way with medical professionals.
Care to elaborate?
Not to mention if the pilot “forgets” to use reversers, or company policy is to use idle reverse, or delays selecting reversers, or floats the transition, or loses an engine, or doesn’t apply max manual braking, or selects minimum autobrake, or, or, or...
For the past 50 years, airline pilots have come from both civilian and military in varying percentage, but always around 50%. Ironically, OP was making a case against military pilots if he was correct in his assertion. The captain on the SWA was likely at least 20 years seniority, so if OP was correct, he/she was military. The fact is that that is an impossible and idiotic assertion that a crew on a major airline made an error because of where they were originally trained. A more logical (and yet not necessarily correct) hypophysis is that the culture and training at the AIRLINE they work for CURRENTLY is an issue.
Pilot hubby says landing is not the problem....taking off from such a runway would be the difficult thing.
It happens more frequently than people realize and most often in clear weather.
My guess, a visual approach, at night. The runway alignment for both airports is the same or very close. 15-20 miles out the pilot sees the beacon for the wrong airport and reports airport in sight. Is cleared for the visual approach and, following the wrong rotating beacon, lands at the wrong airport.
For US carriers I believe the experience level is higher. For foreign carriers, it is more likely to see someone with little big jet experience. Case in point: A good friend of mine went from flying bush pilot in Alaska to Comair flying commuter turboprops to flying the 787 at a Middle East-based airline in about ten+ years.
Gotcha. And I agree.
Haven’t you ever landed with the wheels up?
“That damn horn distracted me.”
/s
As a matter of fact, I have been trying to retire the past six months, but I cant get hired by anyone. Walmart corporate called, but I have to start out as a cashier.....too funny.....I have a USNA degree and an MBA, but the job market is so terrible, Walmart is the only callback out of 50 applications.
I had a client last year who was a USAF jet fighter pilot, and was about to retire. We were killing time before a hearing and so I asked, “Well, what are you going to do when you retire? Are you going to work for the airlines?” He reacted with genuine shock as he shot back “Do I look like a bus driver to you?”
I think the controllers probably cleared him to land, on the runway he missed.
It was a night landing, just after 7 pm.
The ground track is interesting though, looks like it was heading directly for PTK (not BRG) before ATC radar lost it.
I wonder if they selected the destination airport in their avionics by name - Branson - rather than by identifier?
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/SWA4013/history/20140112/2145Z/KMDW/KBBG
It also looks like they got a direct clearance from the MAP VOR and bypassed the flight plan DGD VOR.
I bet this is when the avionics directed error occurred...:^)
That's exactly right. There's a 'cowboy' culture at Southwest. Unfortunately this culture could easily lead to a major accident. And also unfortunately, it will take a major accident to change the culture.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.