Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Well, we see things differently, that much is certain.

I’m a firm believer in mission accomplishment, based in militancy. If the mission is accomplished with pudgy Boy Scouts, I don’t care, they have succeeded. But if a mission fails, I also do not care if the individuals responsible are physically fit. They have failed the mission. They are failures.

That obese supply sergeant I mentioned not only prevented a disaster, he turned it into a great success, that *nobody* else was able to do. No doubt this LTG had a bounty of physically fit supply personnel, NCO’s and officers, available to him. But none of them could do what this supply sergeant could do. Not a one.


31 posted on 01/12/2014 4:57:06 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (There Is Still A Very Hot War On Terror, Just Not On The MSM. Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

You want to lower standards, even for our existing NCOs when they start refusing to follow them.

We have 314 million people today, and a tiny military, but now suddenly we must lower the standards to maintain a skilled and competent military?

No we don’t.


32 posted on 01/12/2014 5:07:04 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson