“Sand does not bind with Cs atoms, neither does NaCl. “
What about “stick toether” as opposed to forming atomic bonds? Sea spray contains other minerals that end up land and they don’t have to “bind” (atomic bonds) to salt to have that happen, they simply are blown from water onto the land.
Ya know, I’d like some data, not just assertions that the public just can’t think and is over reacting. I think it’s reasonable for us to want information on an unprecedented situation.
That’s all I’ve heard since Fukushima - that we shouldn’t be concerned about 3 core melt downs. Situation normal. NOT
Normalcy bias? You want 3 core melt-downs dumping hundreds of tons of radioactive waste water into the ocean for years (and years and years to come) to be the new “normal”?
Those hundreds of tons of contaminated water are 99.999% water.
I too would like to see more hard data, more measurements. I suspect thate the area very close to the plant has lots of contamination. But the amount will diminish rapidly with distance. If you go more than a hundred miles the levels drop to where only VERY high end instruments can detect.