Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Verginius Rufus
"Shasta" was the name for the Far North in the 1854 plan. "Colorado" was the name for the Greater South, but I guess they lost out on that.

"Sequoia" is good, though hard to spell. "Mohave," "El Dorado," "San Gabriel," and "Temecula." Sure, a tree, or mountain, or desert, or butterfly or whatever.

Someone suggested "Reagan" for Southern California, but that's not going to happen. "Coronado" was also suggested for the Far South, but you know that's too much like "Colorado."

70 posted on 01/07/2014 3:28:25 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: x

I think “Sequoyah” was a proposal for what became Oklahoma.

Coronado didn’t actually get into California...Cabrillo did. (Cabrillo was long thought to be Portuguese, but I read a recent book that argued that he was Spanish—the other belief was based on one document which was probably misinterpreted).

Serra is probably too Catholic a name. Indian activists would claim that the Franciscans enslaved their ancestors.

Reagan wasn’t a California native. Nixon was. I guess he is kind of controversial too. At least there has been no effort to make January 9th a national holiday (his birthday).

Maybe “Dystopia” would be a good choice.


73 posted on 01/07/2014 5:13:06 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson