[SharpRightTurn]

Sorry, but Buchanan opposing the Neocon obsession for perpetual U.S. war in the ME does not make Buchanan an anti-Semite.

I am not familiar with the author, but I suspect his attack on Buchanan has a lot to do with the author’s agreement with Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Cheney, George W. Bush, William Bennett, the Wall Street Journal, James Woolsey, John Bolton, Lindsey Graham, Trent Franks, John McCain, etc., etc. in never-ending involvement in wars in that part of the world.

Instead of the author’s obsession with tarring Buchanan for not wanting to get involved in ME wars, how about the author directing a little attention to the internal rot in our country? Buchanan has been fighting that, particularly the mass importation of bottom feeders to our country by our leftist immigration policy. Which policy is supported by several of the persons that the author names as opposed to Buchanan.

[rmlew]

As someone who defended Pat Buchanan in 2000 and debated for him at Columbia and is not a neoconservative, let me make it clear to you, Pat Buchanan is an antisemite. He sees Jewish conspiracies and blames them for almost everything he hates. Unwilling to deal with the reality of Islamic goals of subjugating America, he fantacizes and lies about Jews and Israel. And he has created a fictional history to defend Hitler and other Nazis.
One can easily oppose American foreign policy, neoconservatives, or Israeli policies without being an antisemite. Pat Buchanan never cared not to be.