Sure.
Hitler and the Nazi Party. Opposed various indisputably destructive trends in modern art and literature. Put programs in place to prevent cruelty to animals (cruelty to humans was another matter), and protect the natural environment. Opposed the spread of Communism. Provided millions of jobs to the unemployed. Greatly expanded infrastructure. Promoted science and technology. Gave people somethng to believe in. Taught Germans that class differences were unimportant. Promoted equality of rights for all nations. Insisted that citizens' interests be considered before that of foreigners. Provided for care of the elderly. Provided higher education to all Germans, if capable.
Most, although perhaps not all, of these things are in themselves goods.
Now, obviously, the way such policies were implemented often turned theoretical good to practical evil. And such goals were often ignored in practice.
Obama and the Democrat Party? Do you seriously believe every single goal and policy of this party is inherently evil? Or does the purported good simply come at too high a cost or create other problems?
I think it is scary when people believe their political opponents are irretrievably and 100% evil. Such a POV leads in the long run to the notion that the only way to deal with such people is the way we dealt with the Nazis. Military defeat, unconditional surrender and deliberalization (to coin a phrase).
That may perhaps turn out to be necessary, but I can guarantee you the country after such a process won't be one any of us want to live in.