Sometimes old sayings don’t apply to every situation. This is one of them. How can the Supreme Court say “sure we’ll allow this unconventional marriage over here but not this one over there”? Unless homosexual marriage is miraculously abolished in the next few months polygamy will be legal by 2018. You heard it here first.
That won’t make it right, like I said.
Destroying civilization is not the answer.
“Unless homosexual marriage is miraculously abolished in the next few months polygamy will be legal by 2018. You heard it here first.”
Certainly didn’t hear it here now first.
What you are saying is obvious and has been known for decades ever since the same sex marriage issue came up.
What’s funny is that arguments that same sex marriage would logically lead to polygamous marriages was scoffed at by same sex marriage proponents.
The two wrongs don’t make a right adage fits perfectly to this case.