[Lurker]

“
Until their 17 children require food stamps to feed and other “state benefits” at taxpayer expense.”

Get rid of the state “benefits”. I’m completely in favor of that. And there a lots and lots of single and two parent families with large numbers of children living of the teat of the taxpayer.

The solution is to end the benefits, not abrogate then1st Amendment.

Duh.

[usconservative]

And there a lots and lots of single and two parent families with large numbers of children living of the teat of the taxpayer. The solution is to end the benefits, not abrogate the 1st Amendment.

Oh I completely agree -- the problem will be those who'l argue against ending the benefits "for the children."

Yeah, I know -- we're heartless bastards. (/sarc)