Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A country that sends it's women to fight it's wars is not fit to be called a country. And by the way this is a Congressional call and Congress has never said women are allowed in direct combat roles. But when has the Constitution ever mattered? Not when dictators are calling the shots.
1 posted on 01/04/2014 7:31:55 AM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: NKP_Vet

“A country that sends it’s women to fight it’s wars is not fit to be called a country. “

bingo!


52 posted on 01/04/2014 8:16:16 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Rush’s idea of Amazon battalions has merit.


53 posted on 01/04/2014 8:17:24 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

A country that sends it’s women to fight it’s wars is not fit to be called a country.


Australia, Canada, Israel, New Zealand, Norway, and Sweden are not fit to be called countries? Combat roles are open to to women in all those,,,non-countries.


54 posted on 01/04/2014 8:17:51 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Our current society has been formed by at least 60 years of brainwashing and it is an extremely simple thing to do.

I just watched Marcia Brady, throw her older brother in a karate move.

Just like Pavlov’s dogs.

We see a Black, he always is the best, always smarter, cooler, and better in every way than Whites, White Men that is. Same for women.

Every character in say Seinfeld has sex like an alley cat and it is treated as the only normal behavior. Everyone knows the score. Charlie’s Angels constantly beating up middle aged males. I could go on for thousands of words but I hope you get the idea.

Two or three generations have been treated to this brainwashing and that is exactly what it is and it has worked.


55 posted on 01/04/2014 8:17:55 AM PST by yarddog (Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

When men can bear and nurse children, we will say the genders are equal. Until then, we are not equal and we are lying to ourselves if we continue to say so.


56 posted on 01/04/2014 8:17:59 AM PST by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

I am a woman. I have a lot of skills that aren’t typical ‘woman’ skills .... for example, I’m excellent at building rock cribbing. Although my arms are fairly strong (lifting rocks, hauling hay bales, tamping fence posts), I do not have overall upper body strength ... I just don’t, even though I’ve tried to improve it. There is NO WAY I would endanger another soldier ... man or woman, by trying to attain combat status when I could not pass minimum standards set up for men. This is not a game .... not a PC exercise ... it’s about LIVES that could be lost due to my inability to perform. I like the traditional roles ... men as the fighters and defenders, women stay “home” and take care of what needs taking care of there. If there is mutual respect, then there should be no diminishing of either sex or the roles to which they are most suited. Are there exceptions? Sure ... but the military should not allow itself to be run by the ‘exceptions’ to the rules.


63 posted on 01/04/2014 8:32:56 AM PST by MissMagnolia (You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

They may not die. They may be captured, raped, and tortured.


64 posted on 01/04/2014 8:33:27 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Send an all female platoon in first.

When they don’t have men to carry the load that will quickly put an end to this nonsense.


65 posted on 01/04/2014 8:33:30 AM PST by Iron Munro (Orwell: There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Ever see photos of women that fly A-10’s and other killer machines?.


66 posted on 01/04/2014 8:34:13 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

At the rate the metrosexuals are taking over our military is doomed anyway.


69 posted on 01/04/2014 8:39:20 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
female army photo: Sweden-Killer-Woman-Army-Officer Sweden-Female-Woman-Soldier-Army-Military-Armed-Officer-Pictures.jpg

I, uh, what was the question again?

70 posted on 01/04/2014 8:39:59 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Link to the full-text Free Republic thread.

73 posted on 01/04/2014 8:42:08 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
ideas so horrifically stupid that they will be mocked and scorned by our descendants for centuries to come.

This isn't a stupid idea. Its a well thought out and deliberate plan to destroy the US military as an effective fighting force and to undermine American culture and Western civilization. This is social engineering at its finest.

77 posted on 01/04/2014 8:48:54 AM PST by Count of Monte Fisto (The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Young women are a countrie’s most important resource because they can replace the population. Having them shot off on the front lines is idiocy. But perhaps those in power recognize this and are more than willing to weaken the US


78 posted on 01/04/2014 9:02:19 AM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
"Let us send our daughters to die in battle for the sake of gender neutrality!"

Actually, it should be:

"Let us burden our sons with girls in battle so that we lose the next fighting war, for the sake of gender neutrality!"

In a physical conflict, at sea or on land, an all-male unit is going to kick the ass of a co-ed unit.

The only place where women offer material fighting advantage in combat is aviation, because their bodies can withstand higher g forces. In figher jets, they can fling themselves around in the sky better than their male counterparts. That is according to MALE fighter pilot friends.

This is actually about deliberate sabotage of our military so it will LOSE the next armed conflict to an army that won't play by the stupid "gender neutrality" rules.

80 posted on 01/04/2014 9:06:46 AM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

I am a woman and live in my active duty Navy Commander Son-in-Law’s home. I totally agree with you. Never should we send our women to war.


81 posted on 01/04/2014 9:25:11 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Way to go Matt!


82 posted on 01/04/2014 9:37:32 AM PST by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Bookmark


85 posted on 01/04/2014 9:57:32 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

i’m trying to picture today’s marine that cannot do 3 pushups landing at omaha beach...

freakin insanity

why are we allowing this? why haven’t we surrounded the fedgov in washdc, started banging pots & pans and thrown the bums out like they did in iceland?


88 posted on 01/04/2014 10:19:44 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
How come all the Leftist morons who want to put women in combat units would NEVER put themselves in danger this way? They would not volunteer and they certainly don't want to serve in the military. So, why do any of these people think they should place other people's lives at risk?

I say, put your actions where your mouth is. Join up and volunteer for combat arms, pass selection, and show us proof YOU can do this! You can do the job, can't you? If not, why are you relevant?

93 posted on 01/04/2014 11:46:08 AM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson