To: steelhead_trout
Wouldn’t it have been more appropriate to use 120 starving Norks?
7 posted on
01/03/2014 5:56:55 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(It's not the penalty, it's the lack of coverage on 1 Jan. Think about it.)
To: NonValueAdded
It certainly would have been more merciful. People usually will kill their prey before trying to consume it.
9 posted on
01/03/2014 5:58:14 AM PST by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: NonValueAdded
They weren’t available at the time; all were out on “Bark Patrol”, so the dogs had to fill-in. I doubt there was enough for 120 dogs. Sounds like BS to me.
52 posted on
01/03/2014 6:38:27 AM PST by
Carriage Hill
(Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
To: NonValueAdded
Wouldn’t it have been more appropriate to use 120 starving Norks?
What do you think happened to the dogs?
77 posted on
01/03/2014 11:19:34 PM PST by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson