1 posted on
01/03/2014 5:30:46 AM PST by
thackney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: thackney
It can only be a good thing to eliminate ethanol, period.
2 posted on
01/03/2014 5:33:21 AM PST by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: thackney
citing fears that corn-based fuel production mandates will harm livestock producers. Uh politicians, how about the production mandates hurting consumers??
3 posted on
01/03/2014 5:35:44 AM PST by
Tea Party Terrorist
(Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
To: thackney
This might help Bakken producers
4 posted on
01/03/2014 5:37:22 AM PST by
STJPII
To: thackney
We don’t have a single vehicle that is 2001 or later. We have to drive quite a distance for “marine” gas (non ethanol)
To: thackney
Those that jumped on the ethanol bandwagon knew the ride was going to be short.
I have no sympathy for the 'losers'
If they were really smart, they took their profits and invested in underground fuel tanks, entire home generators and MRE's
8 posted on
01/03/2014 5:41:24 AM PST by
knarf
(I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
To: thackney
I’m not sure most people realize how damaging Ethanol is to most vehicles, especially the engine. Mandating the e85 blend is just insanity.
10 posted on
01/03/2014 5:46:21 AM PST by
rbg81
To: thackney
Live by government central planning, die by government central planning.
To: thackney
Another meddling Feral Government boondoggle that has cost taxpayers billions of dollars (Maybe hundreds of billions) to waste energy in production of ethanol, reduce auto mileage, damage car engines and increase the cost of food.
But the corn and ethanol producers love the government subsidies which is nothing more than corporate welfare by politicians for their crony capitalist pals.
12 posted on
01/03/2014 5:48:10 AM PST by
Iron Munro
(Orwell: There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.)
To: thackney
Burning food for fuel is very stupid. Raised world food prices and starved a lot of people.
I have had my tag line for a long time.
13 posted on
01/03/2014 5:51:40 AM PST by
hadaclueonce
(Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
To: thackney
I hate that ethanol and it takes more energy to produce it than it produces. All it did was give the corn growers an outlet
17 posted on
01/03/2014 5:56:46 AM PST by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: thackney
As I have said before, there is a place for ethanol. But the “Boondoggle” over the blending credit has created a bubble.
All renewable energy is that way. There is a place for biodiesal also, but mandating it drives the market upside down.
19 posted on
01/03/2014 6:00:56 AM PST by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: thackney
"California Democrat Dianne Feinsteina renewable fuel champion--coordinate efforts with Oklahoma Republican Tom Coburn to come up with a Senate bill to get rid of ethanol from the Renewable Fuel Standard "Huh, stopped clock and all that...
21 posted on
01/03/2014 6:03:32 AM PST by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: thackney
To: thackney
Anything that will lower the competition for natural resources needed to make drinkable alcohol is a good thing! /s
To: thackney
And I thought we were going to “Starve To Death” all the worlds poor people which would help the Environment!!
To: thackney
I hope that everyone that was involved in the ethanol scam loses everything.
44 posted on
01/03/2014 6:40:32 AM PST by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
To: thackney
Everybody was happy when corn was less than $2 a bushel, except for the farmers going broke.
45 posted on
01/03/2014 6:42:30 AM PST by
Cloverfarm
(This too shall pass ...)
To: thackney
The use of ethanol for fuel instead of food is insane. To discontinue its mandated production may result in significantly lower food prices, which benefits our nation far more than producing ethanol to reduce are already low fuel imports.
What would also drive fuel costs lower is to offer incentives for oil refineries to build more plants. So many have shut down that the price of fuel is artificially high, and always borderline to shortage.
46 posted on
01/03/2014 6:49:40 AM PST by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(There Is Still A Very Hot War On Terror, Just Not On The MSM. Rantburg.com)
To: thackney
Remove ethanol from our gas and:
1. better running engines with improved mileage
2. gas prices will improve
3. food prices will improve
so, what’s the problem?? Get ethanol off our back!!
47 posted on
01/03/2014 7:19:18 AM PST by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: thackney
quick.....more bribes!!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson