Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Roberts, $6 Million Man, Laments Judiciary's Lack of Funding
Breibart - Big Government ^ | 1-1-2014 | William Bigelow

Posted on 01/02/2014 6:21:52 AM PST by Sir Napsalot

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who used his authority to permit the implementation of Obamacare, robbing Americans of their freedom and their money, used his end-of-the-year report to lament the effect of sequestration on the judicial system.

Calling for more funding for federal courts, Roberts wrote that Congress should use A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens as inspiration to “look at what has made our federal court system work in the past, what we are doing in the present to preserve it in an era of fiscal constraint, and what the future holds if the judiciary does not receive the funding it needs.” He added that the judiciary’s operating costs are only 0.2 percent of the federal budget and it has lived on the chap for years, but sequestration was more deleterious for its health than the other branches of government. He moaned:

The impact of the sequester was more significant on the courts than elsewhere in the government, because virtually all of their core functions are constitutionally and statutorily required. Unlike most Executive Branch agencies, the courts do not have discretionary programs they can eliminate or postpone in response to budget cuts. .....

(Read the rest at linked source)

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barryofthebungle; hesjusttootalented; homoelectus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Hmmmmm.....
1 posted on 01/02/2014 6:21:52 AM PST by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

A judge is just a lawyer with too much power.


2 posted on 01/02/2014 6:23:02 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
More from CJ Roberts -

"In the coming weeks, and into the future, I encourage the president and Congress to be attentive to the needs of the Judicial Branch and avert the adverse consequences that would result from funding the judiciary below its minimal needs."

Is that a veiled threat?

3 posted on 01/02/2014 6:26:19 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

What this forever grinning fool has dished up for Americans would be cause for imprisonment in a well ordered society. He is a traitorous Obama Zombie.


4 posted on 01/02/2014 6:26:50 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

How bout a court tax Johnny?

You seem to like taxes.


5 posted on 01/02/2014 6:27:15 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

The effect of whatever meds he’s on?!?


6 posted on 01/02/2014 6:28:05 AM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Fewer laws, equally enforced could help clear the case backlog.


7 posted on 01/02/2014 6:28:36 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Now we know (absolutely sure) Roberts’ view of a happy ending is more gubmint money, more funding.

Constitutionality be damned.


8 posted on 01/02/2014 6:29:18 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

hey johnny boy,
Eat pooh and croak.


9 posted on 01/02/2014 6:30:00 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

So he wants more money from Congress, and he wants Obama to appoint more judges?

Hahahahahaha.


10 posted on 01/02/2014 6:30:01 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

In this era of fiscal restraint
?
Wtf?


11 posted on 01/02/2014 6:30:44 AM PST by Straight8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Bush sure could pick ‘em.


12 posted on 01/02/2014 6:30:44 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Judge Roberts is EXEMPT, like his staff.

EXEMPT.

EXEMPT to an un-Constitutional tax that he created.


13 posted on 01/02/2014 6:33:27 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

He thinks he’s out of money now, wait till he gets the restitution bill for all our freedom he stole with his Osamacare “ruling”.


14 posted on 01/02/2014 6:33:28 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Roberts = Benedict Arnold = Traitor


15 posted on 01/02/2014 6:37:06 AM PST by Safrguns (PM me if you like to play Minecraft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

There is a fundamental difference between State and Federal criminal prosecutions. State prosecution is based on Ten Commandment thou shall not kill/thou shall not steal philosophy. Federal prosecution is all sovreignty based “how dare you object to the authority of the government to control your life.” For example, the Oklahoma City bombers were not prosecuted for Murder. The actual crime they were charged with was “Destruction of Government Property Resulting in Death.”

Just something to keep in mind as the good Chief Justice asks for more money.


16 posted on 01/02/2014 6:38:31 AM PST by henkster (Communists never negotiate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Exactly.


17 posted on 01/02/2014 6:39:30 AM PST by Track9 (hey Kalid.. kalid.. bang you're dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Since he believes the sequester was “real” and not contrived, that proves he blinded Bush and Roberts is a leftie in disguise.

I no longer believe he was blackmailed; I now believe he just wanted to please 0bummer just like Reggie L0ve.


18 posted on 01/02/2014 6:39:37 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (Pajama-boy-in-chief's beatings continue until morale improves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

- Barry of the Bungle?

- Homo Electus?

- “He’s just ‘too talented’ to do what ‘ordinary people’ do.” - Valerie Jarrett


19 posted on 01/02/2014 6:41:39 AM PST by devolve ("He's just 'too talented' to do what 'ordinary people' do." "Barry of Bungle" "Homo Electus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Roberts, intended to replace Sandra Day O’Connor, has become to GWB like O’Connor was to Reagan. O’Connor should as well still be there since she is paid full retirement.


20 posted on 01/02/2014 6:43:09 AM PST by Theodore R. (People in TX in 2014: Cornball and George P.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson