I agree with you. This publication may be leftist trash, and the author may be a libtard, but your point is spot on: Unmanned warfare makes it too damned easy to kill, and Obastard is proving why war should be difficult and painful. Nothing is more dangerous than a deadly weapon in the hands of a child. There was an episode of the original Star Trek about this.
It's already easy for a president to kill: the vast resources he has at his disposal mean that he could kill millions if he wished. I do not agree with your premise that "war should be difficult and painful." Nothing short of sending his own child to war will make war difficult and painful for a president. For those of us who are sending loved ones into battle, it's already difficult and painful enough, thank you, and I object to the notion that we should have to bear more just to avoid tweaking someone's delicate conscience.