“Fake controversy” . . . like Benghazi? With all due respect, I find it troublesome to read a paraphrase of Susan Rice’s words in another context.
The man may not be coming back, but token gestures like this keep the wicked spirit that motivated him alive. Especially when it’s in a country where a majority still regards Israel as “genocidal” towards the “Palestinians”.
I did not know that Susan Rice had coined the term or copyrighted it. I don’t think this has anything to do with his wicked spirit, as most politicians harbor the same kind of spirit with different labels. It is all politics and PR games.
Why was this even brought up? Who really cared about something pointless that happened in 1933? This was probably one of the many distractions local politicians throw out to keep people from talking about real issues of the moment.
This is like ObamaCare fails and the Democrats start talking about some House resolution from 1933 that absolutely must be changed before anything else happens, and the media harp on it.
“The man may not be coming back, but token gestures like this keep the wicked spirit that motivated him alive. Especially when it’s in a country where a majority still regards Israel as “genocidal” towards the “Palestinians”.”
Agreed. I think it is wrong to rub people’s faces in the past. On the other hand, when situations like this come up, it shouldn’t be controversial to repudiate the Nazis.