Why didn’t they just kill him as soon as they found out he was disabled? If they were so eager to kill him, whether he is inside or outside the womb should not make a difference.
So you are asking what would their reaction be to a judge who ordered the child offered for adoption since it was a burden they parents were unwilling to bear, but seeking damages because they now must.
Or was the "healthy or abort" argument in order to get money
I do sympathize with the parents burden, but not the ethos behind the lawsuit.
I think they would have to wait until Gosnell (the butcher of Philadelphia) is up for parole ... he and his staff would have had no qualms. Of course the Social Worker in Britain could be a back up as she would just hold a pillow over the face of the “defective” to end it’s misery.