Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
Yes it was. Panics like that used to occur every 20 years or so, pre-Fed.

I thought that was behind the whole idea to have a central bank (i.e., to prevent the "Panics"). So after implementation of the Fed, we have both panics and currency debasement - a twofer!

It's nothing personal against the Fed, the reserve system, or the people it employs. It's something that was tried and found not to work as we see from the trouble we've gotten into. Don't go putting all blame on the exec or legislature either. The creation of the Fed allowed them to get away with even more excess.

It's past time to fix the problem. I believe that starts with moving the power back into the hands of "We The People" and not central government or a central bank. If you believe otherwise, state your reason, don't just focus on defending the Fed at every opportunity. There is more at stake here than just the Fed - like our countries existence. If the country goes, everything goes - literally!

Not sure what you mean. The Fed is currently earning 10s of billions that would have been earned by the banks, absent QE.

Exactly, you make my point. They're "bagmen". They make it easier for the government to pull even more money out of the economy and waste it on what the central government deems necessary, like abortion, free housing, cell phones, social engineering, and etc. And now that the government has exceed what the system can produce under the "old rules" it's twisted the arm of the Fed to QE. Some much for the independence the Fed was suppose to provide.

Inside track? You mean like when Citibank trades with JPMorgan, and one profits, one loses?

Start there, if you like, then move on up to the "East Side":

What makes you think the Fed is "an unconstitutional entity"?

More important, I'm not the only one that thinks that. But that's just a defensive diversion. Let's stick with the "big picture", please.

Which lenders did the Fed destroy?

The small town banks - an ongoing process, in conjunction with increased regulation and big bank collaboration.

Yes, cycles before the Fed, cycles after the Fed.

Ok, so you yourself now admit that the implementation of the Federal Reserve system didn't solve the very problem it was implemented for in the first place to prevent. Again, you make my point. :)

Like most such articles, a few facts and many, many errors.

As I've already stated, I haven't seen any article or any person that had ALL of the answers.

It's convoluted, twisted, and hidden, for a reason. There is only one way to fix it once it crashes. Start over with a new foundation and a better design that moves the power back securely into the hands of the people, and out of the hands of a central government. The founders knew that and fought hard against the establishment of a central bank.

233 posted on 12/29/2013 12:20:09 PM PST by Errant (Surround yourself with intelligent and industrious people who help and support each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: Errant
I thought that was behind the whole idea to have a central bank (i.e., to prevent the "Panics").

How many Panics from 1813-1913? From 1913-2013?

It's something that was tried and found not to work

What exactly was found not to work?

I believe that starts with moving the power back into the hands of "We The People" and not central government or a central bank.

What power?

Exactly, you make my point. They're "bagmen". They make it easier for the government to pull even more money out of the economy and waste it on what the central government deems necessary,

I thought you said they were bagmen for the banks?

Start there, if you like, then move on up to the "East Side":

Still waiting for you to explain the inside track as it relates to FX trades.

Thanks for the picture. Not sure what a house owned by the National Trust proves........

More important, I'm not the only one that thinks that.

You're not, but why?

The small town banks - an ongoing process, in conjunction with increased regulation and big bank collaboration.

Yup, we've been losing small town banks since the country was born. Not sure you can blame the Fed for that.

Ok, so you yourself now admit that the implementation of the Federal Reserve system didn't solve the very problem it was implemented for in the first place to prevent.

The Fed can't stop the business cycle and shouldn't try. They have helped reduce the number and severity of downturns.

It's convoluted, twisted, and hidden, for a reason.

What is hidden?

The founders knew that and fought hard against the establishment of a central bank.

The Founders who created a Central Bank in 1791? Signed into law by George Washington? Those Founders?

234 posted on 12/29/2013 12:39:15 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson