Steorts views on gay marriage:
“Against the traditionalist’s “comprehensive union,” the revisionist understands marriage as what I will call “maximal experiential union.” This is two persons’ sharing each other’s lives — conceived not as the facts about their bodies plus the facts about their minds, but rather as the facts about their experienced unity of the two — as comprehensively and deeply as possible. It satisfies in the strongest way the desire to escape the condition of facing life alone. It necessarily involves, and is consummated by, sexual intimacy...”
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/263672/print
Nothing quite like having NRO promote “maximal experiential unions”!
Is he talking about anal sex or what?
Why is Steorts a “Two-ist bigot?” What is so damn sacred about the number two? If a man and a woman can marry, and two men, and two women, why not two men and a woman? Or four men? What the heck is so vital about the #2?
/sarc
Looney toons.
RE: This is two persons’ sharing each other’s lives —
&&&&
Dear Mr Sheorts,
What makes the word “two” unchallengeable?