Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: napscoordinator
This is so stupid. They should have just put those original 36 million without insurance on the Medicaid program. Believe it or not, it would have saved us money in the long run after this monstrosity.

I suggested that it might have been cheaper, a couple of weeks ago and was castigated for it. Not that medicaid would have been better or that medicaid is a good thing, just that it would have been cheaper.

15 posted on 12/22/2013 5:57:44 AM PST by Graybeard58 (_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Graybeard58; napscoordinator

Not just cheaper. It would have been a lot cheaper. The vast majority of people without coverage do so by choice because they are healthy and have minimal health care costs. If they aren’t going to the doctor now, they won’t go when they have Medicaid either.


19 posted on 12/22/2013 6:01:32 AM PST by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58; napscoordinator

Only cheaper in the immediate as compared to the money wasted by the child king. As the uninsured were across the spectrum on income, you would get twice as many at the trough the next year.
The cheapest and most effective plan would be for the federal government to exit healthcare stage right.


31 posted on 12/22/2013 6:10:55 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson