Barack Obama the "next messiah" (A different interview)

Toronto Sun ^ | Dec. 22/13

[Dartman]

Video at link.

[Dartman]

I know there have been a couple of threads on this, but this particular interview with a TV senior producer really surprised me. There actually are some people in the media who "get it".

[mrsmel]

What’s infuriating is that these people consider themselves the intellectual elite but they refused to see or admit what we ordinary citizens (well, almost half of us) could see before he was ever elected the first time. They didn’t want to know, they don’t want us to know, but there are just too many holes in this man’s resume, along with all the inconsistencies we do know about.

[Olog-hai]

That phrase “next messiah” is really offensive, implying that something was amiss with the first. Can Obama’s death pay for all the sins of mankind? because that is part of the definition of a messiah.

[Repent and Believe]

There is no such thing as a “next messiah”. If you know the One and Only Messiah, Jesus Christ, then you already know that.
Praise and exault Him forever!

[ronnie raygun]

accomplices to a crime

[Liz]

On the bright side, fawning presstitutes have certainly contributed to Obama's sinking numbers......though they would be loathe to admit it.

The prostrate MSM sucking-up to Obama has allowed observers to compare the stark contrast between what the MSM wants us to believe about Obama .....and the actual facts at hand.

Keen observer, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote of the "infantilizing" tendency of all-encompassing government.....(so like Obama's governance).

Tocqueville likened massive govt to the authority of a parent. (Conservatives label this the "Nanny State.")

"Daddy" Obama's ultimate objective is apparent: to keep Americans in perpetual childhood.....dependent on govt for their every need; adults forever sucking at the govt teat.

[IMR 4350]

Liberalism/Marxism is a religion and the liberals believe the only reason it hasn’t worked is because the right person hasn’t come along to make it work.

The left always looks for the next “messiah” the person that will finally make liberalism work.

[captmar-vell]

Referring to Nimrod, per Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews - Book 1 Chapter 4:2

“He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence upon his own power. “