Posted on 12/21/2013 12:48:39 AM PST by Slings and Arrows
So you’re ok with cavity searches and forced observed bowel movements as a means to verify a passport?
Being in El Paso while living in NM is like every other state border town. Wise up and this time it was not local authorities, it was the Federal Government. So where would one stay away from if residing in the United States?
How about trying to study a little bit of Geography before piping off?
And despite all your jack booted thugery I can still buy any illegal drug in any town in this country.
Just another sexual assault by the US gov’t on its
citizens.
Just another assault ignored by Congress as the borders
remain OPEN to al Qaeda
(now weaponized by Obama and Holder).
A diligent FReeper needs to track this story and post followups until the thing is completed. As in all initial reports, facts are missing and no doubt some aspects are inaccurate.
It will be interesting to see what comes to light after more investigation.
I have to wonder though, what kind of contraband that could be inserted into a living person’s body would require more than Xray (at the most) to find.
If you can afford the $400.00 per month, if you are able to get coverage, and the $12,000.00 per year deductible.
BOY WHAT A GREAT DEAL PROVIDE BY YOUR DUMB-O- CRAT ELECTED MORONS AND THEIR PUPPET MASTER MAC DADDY THE GREAT.
A dog will alert to a ham sandwich... or a woman with a period... or any subtle signal from the handler. And she was a citizen, no less.
http://www.kob.com/article/stories/s3212603.shtml#.UrWvK32IbMI
Is that the same hospital as this woman’s?
Great post
Everyone needs to shut up, we are now living in a dictatorship, so get over it, no one cried when they put the body scanners in the airports, fondled young children, murdered people for driving too fast or running barracades, so just get used to it, it is ONLY going to get worse. /end sarcasm
Were you and I to do this to any woman the charges would be kidnapping, false imprisonment and rape.
When the federal government does it it’s called following policy.
......and at least reasonably attractive
“A New Mexico woman’s lawsuit claims federal border patrol officers forced her. . . “
Read “border patrol officers” and stopped reading right there.
First, there are no “border patrol officers.” There are Border Patrol Agents.
Second, CBP officers are not Border Patrol Agents. Border Patrol Agents work BETWEEN the POEs, CBP officers work the POEs. She dealt with CBP officers.
She should know the difference: http://www.honorfirst.com/media.htm
Look for the picture to tell the difference.
She can’t even get it straight who she is whining about.
Well I guess we could argue about minutia instead of addressing the problem.
So you're just an asshole troll!?! No surprise there.
So they were border patrol officers.
She can’t even get it straight who she is whining about.
Apparently she does have it straight but she didn't write the article either.
Are you BCW's betting buddy?
Calling Border Patrol Agents “border patrol officers” when they are not, and confusing them with CBP officers is akin to calling a Marine a soldier.
Border Patrol Agents get enough disrespect from the current administration. They don’t deserve sloppy ‘reporting’ and unjust accusations.
I thought you said that they weren’t border patrol agents!?!
“Apparently she does have it straight but she didn’t write the article either”
She did not get it straight: “The Lovington, N.M., woman said border patrol agents subjected her. . .”
They were CBP, not BP.
The ‘reporters’ feel that everyone that works the borders are the same. . .when they are totally different and with different AORs.
Insisting reporters know the basics about what they are reporting on is a bit much, I know, but they must be called on their sloppy and/or ignorant reporting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.