Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

But his real sin was calling homosexuality a sin comparable with bestiality.


He never compared the two. What a shame Goldberg follows gay activists talking points


16 posted on 12/20/2013 5:49:07 PM PST by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RginTN

Phil said “”Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men.””

So yes he did sort of associate homosexuality with bestiality. It was the next sin he listed after homosexuality. It was likely intentional. Many of us have asked what is next after acceptance of homosexuality - bestiality?

So I think that is the key item they are all jumping on. On can say all they want he did not directly associate the two but the inference is there ... by design. I have no problem with the association and cheer him for saying what many of us are thinking.


24 posted on 12/20/2013 6:03:20 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: RginTN
What a shame Goldberg follows gay activists talking points

What's a shame is how much he got paid to ensure he snuck that in to an article that moral conservative Americans would read.

44 posted on 12/20/2013 6:38:49 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (I forgot what my tagline was supposed to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson