But his real sin was calling homosexuality a sin comparable with bestiality.
He never compared the two. What a shame Goldberg follows gay activists talking points
Phil said “”Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men.””
So yes he did sort of associate homosexuality with bestiality. It was the next sin he listed after homosexuality. It was likely intentional. Many of us have asked what is next after acceptance of homosexuality - bestiality?
So I think that is the key item they are all jumping on. On can say all they want he did not directly associate the two but the inference is there ... by design. I have no problem with the association and cheer him for saying what many of us are thinking.
What's a shame is how much he got paid to ensure he snuck that in to an article that moral conservative Americans would read.