Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hoodat

It’s against the law to discriminate against a provider because of race, religion, gender, etc. And scotus has, for all practical purposes, added sexual orientation to that.

Let P&G, for example, decide against XYZ corporation’s bid on the basis of their race. See how fast they get taken to the cleaners.


188 posted on 12/21/2013 11:22:23 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Let P&G, for example, decide against XYZ corporation’s bid on the basis of their race. See how fast they get taken to the cleaners.

We're not talking about accepting a bid. There is no bidding going on here. This is an ongoing contract that had already been awarded with full knowledge of Phil Robertson's religious views and sexual preference, and it was a contract that was never open for bidding.

I must say that I am amazed at your position that the federal government should use the power of the gun to force A&E to keep Phil Robertson on the air based upon some arbitrary claim of discrimination. As one who was formerly self-employed, the ONLY legal qualifications applicable in any contract are contained within that contract. Period. If the contractee wants to terminate me at any time and for any reason, they have that right. Likewise, at any time that I no longer wish to provide work to the contractee, I have the right to terminate, regardless of reason. And why? Because it says it in the contract.

190 posted on 12/21/2013 11:40:22 AM PST by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson