Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric; umgud; Gabz; autumnraine; Cementjungle; Monorprise; dfwgator
It is certainly a freedom of speech issue.

Not even close. It is a free enterprise issue. And A&E can run its network any way it chooses, and the Duck family can choose whether to involve itself in a contract with that network or not. It is A&E's decision alone to make, and it is A&E that stands to reap the rewards or suffer the consequences of their decision.

No one is taking away Robertson's right to free speech or religious freedom. This is not a viewpoint discrimination case. No one is preventing Robertson from saying what he says.

167 posted on 12/21/2013 8:55:29 AM PST by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Hoodat

But it is because of the lack of freedom of expression, where certain points of view arouse media-magnified ire that A&E (or any other enterprise) feels that certain comments are objectionable enough to cost them financial hardship.

Come on!


168 posted on 12/21/2013 8:59:54 AM PST by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodat

I agree with you on this, but not everybody here does. I’ll just have to agree to disagree with them.

I do however, hope A&E gets hosed over this.


169 posted on 12/21/2013 9:02:29 AM PST by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodat

No one is preventing PR from saying what he believes, but they are trying to silence him by making the consequences of speaking out so dire that one would choose to stay quiet instead of pay the price.


172 posted on 12/21/2013 9:15:58 AM PST by ez (Muslims do not play well with others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodat
I believe it is a freedom of speech issue. In an at-will employment situation the company can fire a contractor for any reason really. But only if a person has done something illegal outside the purview of the company, can the company legally not be liable for the contractors time, expenses, etc. So...if you call your boss a douchebag at the Christmas party you can be canned. But if you call your boss a D'bag in an interview with GQ, they can fire you...but then legally you have the right for recompense as I understand it. That is because of free speech.

All Phil did was state his religious beliefs. I believe A&E did not fire him for this reason. He is on "Hiatus" until A and E figures out how many millions of dollars they want to lose!

194 posted on 12/21/2013 3:21:01 PM PST by gr8eman (How ya doin Bob?...Bitchen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodat

>> No one is preventing Robertson from saying what he says.

So in your opinion, political correctness does impede speech in any way whatsoever?


202 posted on 12/21/2013 7:04:38 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodat
>> No one is preventing Robertson from saying what he says.

So in your opinion, political correctness does not impede speech in any way whatsoever?
203 posted on 12/21/2013 7:06:05 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodat

I agree A&E has every right to fire people for any reason they want constitutionally speaking.

Liberals however including hypocritically A&E’s leadership most likely don’t believe in that freedom Instead they believe in the 1964 Civil rights act which explicitly states you can’t fire someone for expressing their religious believes on their own time as Phil Robertson was fired for doing here. (Perhaps they simply believe that applies to liberal religions?)

I don’t agree with the Constitutionality of this act, and am thus in agreement with you in that they can technically fire him for whatever reason they want including unethical reasons like the fact that he doesn’t share their religious believes to stick to their restrictive speech code while on his own time.

That being said Phil should hold the leftist like A&E to their own standards and sue under the civil rights act of 1964. Leftist need to learn that their own oppressive laws should apply to them as much as their enemies.


214 posted on 12/22/2013 3:20:53 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson