Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: campaignPete R-CT; NKP_Vet; Gilbo_3; NFHale; Impy; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; ...
What I find the MOST frustrating on this gay marriage issue is how Republicans *argue* against it, if they do.

It usually goes like :

“I just believe that marriage is ...”

or “Many people believe that homosexuality is ...”

And they use the term homosexuality which implies a state of being like race. That is surrendering under the guise of debating. They call 'sexuality' 'orientation'.

They no longer use the term ‘homosexual behavior’ to distinguish between people and actions. If people's 'sexuality' is really part of their being, like race or sex, then there is no real case against it.
That means the the fight is over and they just mouth the words to appease us.

57 posted on 12/20/2013 6:53:25 PM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

To engage in sodomy is a choice. No one is born a sodomite. Lord, how many women have I known in my life that are shacking up with another woman, that was married to a man for years and had 5 or 6 children by him. All the sudden at age of 45 they realize they’re “lesbian”. Yea, they were really “born” that way. Nothing they can do about it. And I believe in the tooth fairy.


58 posted on 12/20/2013 7:45:02 PM PST by NKP_Vet ("Rather than love, than money, than fame, then give truth" ~ Henry David Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: sickoflibs

Republicans are not opposed to “gay marriage”. Conservatives are.

The leadership of the NY GOP helped push it thru.
The majority of rank ‘n file Republican voters opposed it.

same in CT.

Of course, no organized effort exists to stop the “Gay Marriage” movement. Not the GOP. Not the churches. lip service, yes. There were isolated instances in NY where GOP gay marriage Senators were primaried and defeated. Isolated.

In Iowa, there was an organized backlash. Nationally, there is no backlash. Accomodation and surrender.


60 posted on 12/20/2013 8:29:44 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (h2h? head-to-head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: sickoflibs
If people's 'sexuality' is really part of their being, like race or sex, then there is no real case against it. That means the the fight is over and they just mouth the words to appease us.

nope, doesnt work that way, as with any sin, there is a choice to be made...even if it was a hereditary trait, which would seem odd, being that it requires hetero sex to pass it to the next generation, the choice could and should be made to repent and not do it anyways...

they could choose to NOT to participate, just as i should avoid pre-marital or any other sexual sin too...

and yes, there are still some people that 'wait til theyre married' , as they should according to Scripture...

i think "queer" is a better term, which simply means unusual...

well over 50% of the population is disgusted by butt stuffers, making the few percent of those who choose to do so, "queers"...

the marriage relationship is supposed to reflect the Glory of The Lord and His plans, the Design being a man and a woman, working together as one...

87 posted on 12/22/2013 1:15:57 AM PST by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson