Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Comments?
1 posted on 12/19/2013 12:43:28 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Marrying and giving in marriage is a very blatant sign of the end, is it not?


2 posted on 12/19/2013 12:48:32 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Plural homosexual marriages next, followed by Pedophile marriages, people marrying their pets and so on.

All of these will be ‘cheered’ by ‘reason’ too I’m sure.

And civil society collapses outright.

“because wickedness shall abound - the love of many, will grow cold” - Matthew 24:12


3 posted on 12/19/2013 12:51:14 AM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah. Reason. Polygamy is sane public policy.

Reason. Oh yeah.


4 posted on 12/19/2013 12:53:38 AM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The extreme left are creating a backlash against themselves... one that is of Biblical Proportions... you wait and see.


5 posted on 12/19/2013 1:16:31 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“informal and contractual gay unions that have existed for decades”

This guy thinks the history of sodomites shacking up only extends “decades” into the past?


6 posted on 12/19/2013 1:22:04 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Polygamy has been widespread throughout history, including early Christianity. Charlemagne had three official wives and many concubines.

Homosexual marriage has never been practiced anywhere at anytime until now.


7 posted on 12/19/2013 1:34:20 AM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
How many believe that this push has a Muslim ‘multiple wives’ aspect behind it? Eroding this Judeo-Christian value strengthens Koranic dogma.
9 posted on 12/19/2013 1:51:19 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Silver lining has been pointed out before, no more more inheritance taxes when pleural marriages in name only occur with parents and children.


11 posted on 12/19/2013 3:22:45 AM PST by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Remember when they used to say it wasn’t about polygamy and boys using girls bathrooms? That these were scare tactics?

...they lied.

Legalization of prostitution, bestiality, and lowering of consent laws are next folks. The society is beyond sick and getting worse.


12 posted on 12/19/2013 3:34:29 AM PST by icwhatudo (Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If the law allows polygamy, then the law should also allow each additional spouse to be a tax deduction.

So, one would then expect people to enter into fake marriages strictly for tax reasons.

If the slope isn’t slippery enough, throw some grease on it.


13 posted on 12/19/2013 3:47:10 AM PST by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t consider this ruling “a big win” for polygamists regardless of the hype.

The case was not about polygamy, but bigamy.

In bigamy, when the bigamist cohabits with another, they’re doing it in a different location and w/o knowledge of wife #1.

Since wife #1 is living w/the group, and not somewhere else, there’s no bigamy going on.


14 posted on 12/19/2013 4:32:01 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Heck yeah—in Jerry Springer’s Amerika a fella ought be able to divorce his wife and marry his TV set—or his favorite dog.But this is NOT the nation established in 1776


15 posted on 12/19/2013 5:00:43 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

17 posted on 12/19/2013 9:23:15 AM PST by CodeToad (When ignorance rules a person's decision they are resorting to superstition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson