Posted on 12/18/2013 8:24:58 PM PST by Bringbackthedraft
The U.S. Army War College, which molds future field generals, has begun discussing whether it should remove its portraits of Confederate generals
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Are all of the portraits of American generals, or are there any from other countries?
Let me guess. General Sherman’s picture with all the atrocities his army committed can stay?
America demands Justice for the Fallen of Benghazi! |
I would imagine they need to make room for some fag portraits.
well they’ve re-written the History about practically everything else, so why not?
I swear it’s getting to the point where I don’t even want to read anything anymore I’m so darn disgusted.
How can you study US Military history without including these guys? Sheesh.
How can you study US Military history without including these guys? Sheesh.
This is utterly ridiculous and will not happen.
(People are beginning to wake up and see how un-American [and unprofessional] this group in DC is.)
Is this the same place holding homo weddings?
I mean, really. Homos are normal and OK out in the open in real life today, but a regular long-dead American soldier is not.
Sure, hell, replace them with Che, Stalin, Castro, Nero......whatever the hell strokes their fancy. We have been prostituting everything else in America. Oh, and don’t forget a Gay/Lesbian so and so..............NUTS!!
These where men of Honor. They didn’t plant hidden explosives in ice cream shops and blow civilians up in order to terrorize them. They didn’t bring down planes and passengers and then hid in the shadows claiming responsibility.
They stood toe to toe and faced musket and cannon and took the huge risk of life and limb for what they believed was the only means to fight the creeping Federalism. Hence the name ‘Confederate’.
I doubt many in today’s military could stand up to the vigor that those men did. Those where the day’s where Generals and Colonels where routinely killed in action. Not getting purple hearts for butt sores like today’s officers.
Before I delve into what the great Wolseley wrote about General Lee, let me first tell you about Sir Garnet Wolseley and establish with you his credibility both for greatness in his own right and as an individual who could recognize greatness in others from the lofty perch of his own character and accomplishments.
Let me begin by saying that Wolseley is generally given credit for the transformation of the British army from a gentleman’s army to a modern fighting force. He was the one who prepared the Brits to play a key role in the winning of the First World War.
He was attracted to the military at an early age and followed in the footsteps of his military father. From the beginning he was destined for greatness. His first action was in the Crimean War where he was elevated to the rank of captain at age 21. Because of his youth there was opposition to his holding this rank. When he threatened resignation if the rank were taken away, his superior officers recognized greatness and allowed him to maintain the rank. Just three years later he became the youngest lieutenant colonel in the British army.
Wolseley served in India and China before being sent to Canada in 1861 to help plan for possible war against the Union forces of the United States after northern forces had illegally removed two Confederate diplomats from a British ship.This was the famous Trent Affair. He traveled in secret to Virginia to study the organization and effectiveness of the Confederate army since it was primarily a volunteer army. He spent much time with generals Lee, Jackson and Longstreet and was highly impressed by all three. It was Robert E. Lee, however, who most impressed Wolseley.
Based on this time with the Confederates he wrote “A Month’s Visit to the Confederate Headquarters” which was published in Blackwood’s magazine and is still well-known today.
Garnet Wolseley later served in Cyprus as the first high commissioner of that island after it came into the empire and as governor and commanding general in South Africa Natal Province. In 1880 he returned to England and was made adjutant general which gave him authority over military training. In 1882 he was sent to Egypt to quell a nationalist uprising where his brilliant tactics led to suppression of the revolt. To show the gratitude of the British government, Wolseley was made a baron and paid a reward of 30,000 pounds. In 1884 he was made viscount and in1894 was made field marshall. In 1895 he was promoted to commander-in-chief of the British army.
Viscount Wolseley also found time to author THE LIFE OF MARLBOROUGH, THE DECLINE AND FALL OF NAPOLEON and SOLDIERS POCKET BOOK FOR FIELD SERVICE, the bible of the British army.
This is only a brief portrait of the brilliant Wolseley - a man of great honor, accomplishment and intelligence. How would a man of his stature describe Robert E. Lee? Let me list just a few direct quotes from the pen of this great man:
” I desire to make known to the reader not only the renowned
soldier, whom I believe to have been the greatest of his age,
but to give some insight into the character of one whom I
have always considered the most perfect man I ever met.”
Wolseley on Lee
Thank you for your wonderful information and insight!
Thanks for posting that, yarddog.
That is beautiful, and wonderful to read, especially considering the source. I concur, from everything I’ve ever read about Robert E Lee.
Very interesting and enlightening. Thank you.
These people must be ashamed of their own American history.
Read about Col. Joshua Chamberlain, who was a hero at Gettysburg, and was appointed to preside over the Confederates final surrender. He honored the surrendering soldiers by having the troops present arms as the defeated army passed. This was class. Removing Gens Lee and Jackson’s paintings from ANY wall in America is classless!
AMEN.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.