To: lowbridge
First they said they just want the religious displays out of the public square because it is unconstitutional, and that it fine to have it in your yard.
Now they want it out of your yard.
5 posted on
12/17/2013 3:34:01 PM PST by
VanDeKoik
To: VanDeKoik
First they said they just want the religious displays out of the public square because it is unconstitutional, and that it fine to have it in your yard. Now they want it out of your yard.
The next obvious step is out of the house, because why should the children be subjected to the parents' religious beliefs?
Then, stamp religion out of our hearts and minds. Mission accomplished.
53 posted on
12/17/2013 6:06:00 PM PST by
Zeppelin
(Keep on FReepin' on...)
To: VanDeKoik
First they said they just want the religious displays out of the public square because it is unconstitutional, and that it fine to have it in your yard.
Now they want it out of your yard. The tried and true pervert GLBT "just a little tolerance" gambit. Camels got nothing over dedicated perverts!
For those of you in Rio Linda, perverts and religion can't coexist.
Christmas is religious.
Ergo Christmas must go.
Q.E.D.
62 posted on
12/17/2013 11:10:20 PM PST by
publius911
( At least Nixon had the good grace to resign!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson