[LearsFool]

The first one was a fake. Why should it hinder him from getting married?

The problem here is not bigamy, but sodomy. Plus its accompanying perversities. Plus the rampant wickedness and ungodliness in this “Christian nation”.

But we’ve given up hacking at the root, and instead find some comfort in complaining about the fruit.

[Sergio]

But we’ve given up hacking at the root, and instead find some comfort in complaining about the fruit.

Wonderful use of the language.

[tanknetter]

What I wonder is whether either “marriage” is truly legitimate, or if the three people involved are just part of a well-planned setup to create a case (or multiple cases) that’ll help push the legal definition of marriage over a cliff.

[Mrs. Don-o]

"But we’ve given up hacking at the root, and instead find some comfort in complaining about the fruit."

All this is the "fruit" of contraception, i.e. we can change the very definition of sex, disassemble, throw out the components we don't like, reassemble in a different shape.

Once you've deconstructed sex, it's easy to deconstruct marriage. It's not a slippery slope, it's a logical Interstate Highway.