What makes you think I haven’t clearly stated my position in the thread?
Have you considered that my first statement is clear enough?
Do you think the first, clear principles evident from the text and historical tyranny faced by the founders are reason enough to believe they supported the notion that all legislation should be vested in regularly elected representatives and not a bureaucracy?
As we are the only ones participating in this thread now, it seems we are talking past each other, doesn’t it?
YOU queried: “Where do you get the idea you have interpreted my position accurately?” MY response was to ask where you thought I had gone wrong. And to that, you have declined to offer any correction.