The same holds true here. Once we accept the argument that marriage is a “right” any consenting adults should possess, we won’t be able to parcel that “right” out to only certain configurations of people. The usual liberal judicial activism will be enough to widen the definition to just about everything.
“The usual liberal judicial activism will be enough to widen the definition to just about everything.”
Which in practice will make it mean nothing. Then again, that was their plan all along:
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
Well, there’s certainly a lot more cultural and historic precedence for polygamy then there is for homosexual “marriage”
And those same Godless freaks also get to decide on how old someone needs to be for consent. Whoopie Goldberg will be pleased