Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eleutheria5
Next will it be unconstitutional to wear a religious symbol openly on your neck while walking on a public sidewalk?

There cases in Europe when it was argued whether a cross on the neck is permissible as ornamental jewelry or still too offensive. The question whether a crucifix worn for the purpose of identification with Christ is offensive: everyone understood that it would be. The setting was hospitals and perhaps schools, and in one case a TV anchorwoman attire.

Soon, very soon, your prediction will come true.

171 posted on 12/15/2013 11:20:49 AM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

I’m no Christian, but it offends the hell out of me that they are suppressing free speech and destroying an historical landmark in the name of the 1st Amendment.


173 posted on 12/15/2013 11:37:20 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson