To: Dave346
You could argue that Mugabe is worse then Castro.
3 posted on
12/11/2013 12:18:04 PM PST by
DManA
To: DManA
Exactly what I was thinking. Course in a sense Obama is worse than Castro himself.
Castro at least is making small free marker reforms while Obama is pushing dictatorial fascism with big leaps.
8 posted on
12/11/2013 12:23:33 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: DManA
You could argue that Mugabe is worse then Castro.Castro wasn't an overt racist.
You could also argue about who Obama admires more. /S
To: DManA
ask any white Rhodesian farmer about Mugabe and his terr thugs
To: DManA
Mugabe is worse than Castro.
Castro's Cuba is faring much, much better than Mugabe's Zimbabwe -- on just about any measure you chose to use. For instance, Zimbabwe's per-capita GDP is the world's lowest. Cuba's is nearly 20 times higher.
Mugabe is so bad that the (British) Commonwealth of Nations suspended Zimbabwe in 2002, until Zimbabwe withdrew in 2003 (effectively expelled) mainly because of egregious and ongoing human-rights violations, elections fraud, etc.
To: DManA
You could argue that Mugabe is worse then Castro. The Castros would imprison or murder people for political dissent. Mugabe does the same, but he also murders people for the sole "crime" of having white skin. This must make him an even greater hero in Obama's pantheon.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson