People thought Justice Roberts was cleaver when he declared the noncompliance fines imposed by the ACA were instead a tax. Please correct me if I’m wrong but since any tax levied on the people, according to our constitution, can only come from the House, there was hope that the House would force compliance of that rule, thus killing the ACA. Obviously that was wishful thinking. The real reason Roberts declared the ACA fine as a Tax, other than that was what he told to do, is because an individual can challenge an imposed fine in court and a fine for not purchasing health insurance would, for all intents, have been found unconstitutional in a lower court. The legality of a Federal Tax once it becomes law can not be challenged. With that, Justice Roberts is as wretched and treasonous as the other anti-constitutionalist justices as well as the establishment cabal now running DC.
Of course it can be challenged*, but you should bring guns.
* The courts are all too eager to throw out the individual's complaints, or any challenge or limit to its power/authority: see president, standing, stare decisis, and all manner of rejecting/reinterpreting the Constitution[s] binding the court.