Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibLieSlayer

I think you’re mixed up.

What I like is:
a) permanent changes in law that reduce entitlement spending traded for temporary spending increase that in part offset sequester cuts to military.
b) no more shut-down leverage during this Congress

I do not like billion dollar deficits or trillions of dollars of debt. That must have been someone else’s post where you read that someone liked that. I wish we could eliminate that. Don’t you?


18 posted on 12/11/2013 5:05:01 AM PST by Principled (I am tired of a lawless government. I want a government restrained by the Constitution [Irenic])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Principled

Whatever happened to just passing a budget, as required by law. Cutting spending, and then standing your ground when you’re being attacked by the Democrats. Try living up to your screenname.


19 posted on 12/11/2013 5:08:12 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Governor Sarah Heath Palin for President of the United States in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Principled

Same old ****... different day. I no longer will back bills that do nothing but give false cover for people to hide behind. Name me one time in US history that any spending reduction deal passed in legislation and signed onto by dims was ever honored by future dims? Have you never heard a rat say, “We are not constrained by what past legislatures have agreed to”? tipp o’neil screwed Reagan... bush had his “No new taxes” shoved up his stove pipe.


56 posted on 12/11/2013 6:34:51 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson