Did I read something into this statement that wasn't there? ...
The kid was obviously capable of taking the cop down and the cop was given a chance to walk away, but no-oooo-oooo ...
I don't see the caveats in there. I guess I should have grabbed my Madam Cleo crystal ball and seen your revisions before you posted them. LOL
Yeah ..
You implied there is a way things work (obversely a way things don't work and a choice must be made)
And you infered the kid beat the cop down.
I think the cop made a mistake when stopping the kid and should have "read" the situation better.
Not gonn'a discuss this anymore ... let's see what developes