Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory

No, the judge ruled correctly. The problem is the law itself.

As you noted, this judge is very junior and we don’t want individual activist judges ignoring laws they don’t like. His job was to ensure the law was being applied as written by the legislature, which is exactly what he did. He has to apply bad laws with the good.

The only judicial body with the authority to invalidate state laws is the Colorado Supreme Court, which is exactly where the defendants should be looking today.


170 posted on 12/10/2013 4:30:36 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: highball

no because there are other superceeding laws and there is precident.

This judge is still making law to favor a BEHAVIOR.

This is no different than a divorce law firm that caters only to men or women. There judges can not force a customer upon the business.


173 posted on 12/11/2013 12:33:53 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson