Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: volunbeer

My assertion is that whatever US Attorneys pressed it, while the principal is basically immune, all parties to the conspiracy are not, either to prosecution or public exposure...both of which achieve a purpose.

However, I’ve no idea what to do about the media...except turn them off. Prepared to give up your cable, satellite & sports guys & gals?


37 posted on 12/07/2013 1:54:46 PM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869

Your assertion was previously discussed here on FR and that was a very interesting thread. I believe the general consensus after a feisty debate was that academic institutions could hide behind privacy laws, but if it could be proven that someone in the rat party or government knew they would not be immune because they would be party to the crime.

My belief would be for Obama to get jammed he would have to commit a documented act in furtherance of the conspiracy. He has minions that can get their hands dirty and he has that Teflon politician ability to claim ignorance.

I expect to learn the truth after he is out of office - there won’t be much of an incentive to cover any longer and he will lose a good amount of protection via his administration. Maybe I am wrong, but almost everyone here will be able to say “told you so!”


40 posted on 12/07/2013 2:07:59 PM PST by volunbeer (We must embrace austerity or austerity will embrace us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson