I could take it as supporting a thesis otherwise proven.
And, again, I think Barry’s as fraudulent as they come.
But because some clerk in HI typed a work that wasn’t supported in a government process manual over 50 years ago?
Just seems like pretty tepid evidence to have to base any kind of case on, let alone one of this stature.
It would be a detail. There are far worse problems with these alleged documents, and really the big picture is that this is a test of a very gullible America that way too much of America is failing.