Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oliviaforever

You mean a government elected by whites? Sorry, but if you are disenfranchised and have no democratic outlet, violence is understandable, and probably the only effective chance of gaining that freedom. As for his gaining support from the ussr and other dictatorship, let’s remember that the American revolutionaries were cultivating the support of France and Spain, absolute monarchies of many orders of magnitude worse than Britain, and Churchill cultivated Stalin during wwii out of practical necessity, Mandela was by no means perfect, and whilst the fawning of lefties who consider him to be nothing less than black Jesus are idiots, simply dismissing him as a commie terrorist is also grossly wrong.


18 posted on 12/06/2013 4:20:27 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: sinsofsolarempirefan

Thanks for drawing valid distinctions. One-sided analogies get my goat.


21 posted on 12/06/2013 4:29:12 PM PST by kenavi (Debunk THIS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

His insistence on not repudiating violence probable made apartheid last 10 years longer. In the end, it was not violence that lead to the changes, but stood in the way of it as one of biggest issues during negotiations. Not saying the SA government was innocent, but to be honest, if they wanted to win that war by force, the ANC was not going stop them.


22 posted on 12/06/2013 4:29:14 PM PST by Ironfocus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson