Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Piano Police
Washington Times ^ | December 6, 2013 | Staff

Posted on 12/06/2013 5:29:47 AM PST by raptor22

Bureaucrats at the Federal Trade Commission must have a lot of spare time. The agency recently swooped to rescue the American people from the threat posed by a collaborative organization of 22,000 professionals who sit down with youngsters and teach them how to play a piano.

As first reported by The Wall Street Journal, regulators forced the Music Teachers National Association, a century-old nonprofit, to accept a consent decree over the group’s code of ethics, which simply encouraged members not to pilfer or recruit students from fellow members. Only in a twisted bureaucratic mind would such a sensible provision be seen as a restraint of trade or a violation of federal law. The Federal Trade Commission is singing off the wrong song sheet.

The association did everything possible to appease the peevish regulators, including expunging the offending language from its code of ethics. The code has never even been enforced, because the obligation for members to follow the code is moral, not legal.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: govtabuse; obama; pianos; tyranny

1 posted on 12/06/2013 5:29:47 AM PST by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Non-compliance will force the FTC to send in their SWAT teams and shoot up your piano, you and your dog.


2 posted on 12/06/2013 6:04:45 AM PST by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Check this out. Out of control again.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/05/criminalizing-everyone/


3 posted on 12/06/2013 6:54:16 AM PST by prof.h.mandingo (Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Only in a twisted bureaucratic mind would such a sensible provision be seen as a restraint of trade or a violation of federal law.

Would Ford, GM and Chrysler agreeing not to go after each other's customers similarly be a "sensible provision"? Now I agree that it is a silly exercise of state power, similar to a cop writing a ticket for spitting on a sidewalk while a bank robbery is going on across the street, but agreeing not to compete for the same customers is restraint of trade.

4 posted on 12/06/2013 7:52:05 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Everyone get online for Obamacare on 10/1. Overload the system and crash it hard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
"Would Ford, GM and Chrysler agreeing not to go after each other's customers similarly be a "sensible provision"? Now I agree that it is a silly exercise of state power, similar to a cop writing a ticket for spitting on a sidewalk while a bank robbery is going on across the street, but agreeing not to compete for the same customers is restraint of trade. "

0DontCare isn't a restraint of trade?

5 posted on 12/06/2013 8:04:34 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson