Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop
The UK never enacted a Flag Act. It would cost too much to change the design and I think they’ll keep it for historic reasons.

The cost issue can be addressed easily enough by simply saying that flags will be replaced only as they need to be replaced.

Legally, the mechanism for changing the Flag is a proclamation by the Monarch.

And many countries associated with the former British Empire, Australia and New Zealand have the Union Jack in the upper right hand canton - as did Canada prior to 1964 when it flew the Canadian Red Ensign as its national flag.

Yes, and they could retain it, because it symbolises their historic link to the nation that created their nations. Their flags would not change to reflect a change in the Union Flag because the presence of the Union Flag does not reflect a current legal link, only an historical one.

Subnational units - Hawaii and the Canadian provinces of Manitoba and Ontario have the Union Jack in the upper right hand canton of their flags. Its a classic design and is not going to ever be altered.

So do all the Australian states, but again, that's a reference to their history, and there would be no reason to change that reference to their history.

30 posted on 12/05/2013 3:26:32 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


Brothers and Sisters are Natural Enemies
Like Englishmen and Scots,
or Welshmen and Scots
or Japanese and Scots
or Scots and other Scots
Damn Scots!
They ruined Scotland!!


33 posted on 12/05/2013 3:38:42 PM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson