Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76

Nowhere does it say in 1401 that tax credits are ONLY applied to 1311. 1401 is amended to the IRC and is subject to the IRC’s general provisions.

In the part that I copied in the previous post it says that 36B(b)(2)(A) applies to 1311, ***or*** the tax credit can be applied as in part 36B(b)(2)(B) which does not reference 1311:

``(B) the excess (if any) of—
``(i) the adjusted monthly premium for such month for the applicable second lowest cost silver plan with respect to the taxpayer, over
``(ii) an amount equal to 1/12 of the product of the applicable percentage and the taxpayer’s household income for the taxable year.

The above specifies the tax credits that can be applied to non-1311 exchanges and if that’s not enough there can be other governing provisions of IRC that can be brought into play.

The bottomline is this lawsuit goes nowhere, it is a distraction and a waste of time from where the real deciding battles are which are the 2014 and 2016 elections, to which the democrats response is immigration reform where they will pick up millions upon millions of votes illegally registered but that will be counted unless challenged before.


64 posted on 12/05/2013 7:27:09 AM PST by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage
SEC. 1401(a) In General.--Subpart C of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to refundable credits) is amended by inserting after section 36A the following new section:
SEC. 36B (a) In General.--In the case of an applicable taxpayer, there shall be allowed 
             as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle for any taxable year 
             an amount equal to the premium assistance credit amount of the taxpayer for
             the taxable year.

         (b) Premium Assistance Credit Amount.--For purposes of this section--
        
             (1) In general.-- <> The term `premium assistance 
                 credit amount' means, with respect to any taxable year, the sum 
                 of the premium assistance amounts determined under paragraph (2)
                 with respect to all coverage months of the taxpayer occurring 
                 during the taxable year.
 
             (2) Premium assistance amount.--The premium assistance amount determined
                 under this subsection with respect to any coverage month is the amount
                 equal to the lesser of--

                    ``(A) the monthly premiums for such month for 1 or more 
                          qualified health plans offered in the individual   
                          market within a State which cover the taxpayer, the 
                          taxpayer's spouse, or any dependent (as defined in 
                          section 152) of the taxpayer and which were enrolled in 
                          through an Exchange established by the State under 1311 
                          of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or

                    ``(B) the excess (if any) of--
                           ``(i) the adjusted monthly premium for such 
                                 month for the applicable second lowest cost silver 
                                 plan with respect to the taxpayer, over
                          ``(ii) an amount equal to 1/12 of the product 
                                 of the applicable percentage and the taxpayer's 
                                 household income for the taxable year.
36B(b)(2) specifies the premium assistance amount is equal to the lesser of A or B [SEC. 36B(b)(2)(A) or SEC. 36B(b)(2)(B)].

How to you suppose that the premium assistance credit amount of the taxpayer is the lesser of their premium under (A) [explicitly specified as a state exchange under 1311], or (B) [which you claim includes federal plans]? Is the taxpayer in both a state and federal exchange and whichever is the lesser premium applies?

Since 36B(b)(2)(A) specifically refers to Exchanges established by the State under 1311 then 36B(b)(2)(B) must necessarily also refer to Exchanges established by the State under 1311, otherwise 36B(b)(2) is meaningless.

65 posted on 12/05/2013 9:25:19 AM PST by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson