The people who did the show did not ask whether the cop’s fingerprints were on the ammo clip or bullets in it. They only said that the woman’s fingerprints were found on the trigger/handle.
Since the copy owned the gun, you would expect his prints to be all over it. I learned this in Criminal Investigation Techniques I in 1975. The same rules of checking out a weapon apply today, unless you want to cover-up something.
Also, I didn’t hear anything about gun-powder residue on the woman’s hands. Did I miss it or did they not mention it?
The woman’s right leg position bothered me. If she was pushed backward by the shot, or if she collapsed in situ, why was her leg partially bent upward?
Also, I believe the issue was raised by the family about no blood splatter being found on the muzzle of the gun.
Lots of questions NOT ASKED by the show’s producers/crew or not presented during it. WHY NOT to both issues.
The other thing that stood out to me was what she was doing with 50 of his Oxycodones in her pocket leaving his prescription bottle empty.
Was he an Oxycodone freak???
Was his wild behaviour linked to his abuse of Oxycodone???
And so she hid the pills from him and that set him off???
And in a wild rage in need of his fix he puts a gun in her face and demands his pills back — then bang.