Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Future Snake Eater
It wasn't changed via the amendment process outlined in the Constitution?

I didn't say that.

I just said it wasn't right.

Roe vs Wade was "Constitutionally" decided as well, as was John Roberts' Obamacare decision. (I know there's a difference between judicial decisions and Constitutional amendments....both, however, are guided by the Constitution.)

30 posted on 11/28/2013 6:56:38 PM PST by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Washi

Except it was right. You’re also confusing a rightfully amended Constitution with misrulings on the part of the Supreme Court.


35 posted on 11/28/2013 8:55:51 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Washi

Roe v. Wade and Obamacare were not based on the Constitution at all. The former invented a “right to privacy” that just doesn’t exist and the latter deemed the power to tax to apply to the act of breathing. The 17th Amendment came about due to significant corruption in the selection of senators by state legislatures.

Maybe an imperfect solution, but it sure as hell wasn’t crammed down anyone’s throats.


42 posted on 11/29/2013 4:16:59 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson